woman smiling looking at person across from them at table
Research

Unconscious Biases & Vote Choice Survey

Galvanize Action conducted a survey of two groups of 600 moderate white women (total n= 1,200) from October⁠–November 2024. This survey examined how racial resentment and internalized sexism shaped this audience’s civic choices. The analysis suggests that unconscious biases play a significant role in shaping vote choice and perceptions of presidential candidates among moderate white women. 

KEY OPINION QUESTION #1
In the 2024 presidential election, who do you plan to vote for? 

  • Kamala Harris
  • Donald Trump
  • Another candidate
  • Not sure
  • Will not vote

Moderate white women (n= 1,200)

Kamala Harris35%
Donald Trump48%
Another candidate3%
Not sure9%
Will not vote6%

TOPLINE TAKEAWAY

  • Nearly half (48%) of moderate white women said they would vote for Donald Trump, compared to 35% who said they would vote for Kamala Harris.

VOTE CHOICE BY LEVEL OF INTERNALIZED SEXISM

This survey asked custom questions containing items from Galvanize Action’s internalized sexism scale. Based on their responses, participants were grouped as those with lower internalized sexism, average internalized sexism, and higher internalized sexism. The following is the same vote choice question as above, this time segmented by levels of internalized sexism.

Moderate white women (n= 1,200)

Low Internalized SexismAverage Internalized SexismHigh Internalized Sexism
Kamala Harris36%54%9%
Donald Trump8%54%38%
Another candidate34%56%9%
Not sure14%61%25%
Will not vote23%59%18%
  • Among moderate white women who planned to vote for Kamala Harris, 36% held lower-than-average levels of internalized sexism, 54% held average levels, and 9% held high levels. 
  • Among Donald Trump voters, just 8% held low levels of internalized sexism while 54% were average and 38% held higher-than-average levels of internalized sexism.

The table below is the same data grouped by levels of internalized sexism rather than by vote choice.

Moderate white women (n= 1,200)

Kamala HarrisDonald TrumpAnother candidateNot sureWill not vote
Low Internalized Sexism63%20%5%6%7%
Average Internalized Sexism34%47%3%10%6%
High Internalized Sexism13%73%1%9%4%
  • Among moderate white women with low levels of internalized sexism, 63% intended to vote for Kamala Harris, while 20% intended to vote for Donald Trump. In contrast, among those with high levels of internalized sexism, 73% planned to vote for Donald Trump, compared to only 13% who supported Kamala Harris.  
  • For respondents who indicated they would vote for another candidate, are undecided, or did not plan to vote, there was a more balanced distribution across levels of internalized sexism. 

VOTE CHOICE BY LEVEL OF RACIAL RESENTMENT

This survey also asked custom questions containing items from a racial resentment scale. Based on their responses, participants were grouped as those with lower racial resentment, average racial resentment, and higher racial resentment. The following is the same vote choice question as above, this time segmented by levels of racial resentment.

Moderate white women (n= 1,200)

Low Racial ResentmentAverage Racial ResentmentHigh Racial Resentment
Kamala Harris43%48%9%
Donald Trump11%58%31%
Another candidate9%75%16%
Not sure23%57%19%
Will not vote27%55%18%
  • Among moderate white women who reported they would vote for Kamala Harris, 43% hold lower-than-average levels of racial resentment while 48% hold average levels and just 9% are high in racial resentment.
  • Conversely, just 11% of those who planned to vote for Donald Trump hold low levels of racial resentment. 58% hold an average level of racial resentment, and 31% hold higher-than-average levels of racial resentment. 

The table below is the same data grouped by levels of racial resentment rather than vote choice.

Moderate white women (n= 1,200)

Kamala HarrisDonald TrumpAnother candidateNot sureWill not vote
Low Racial Resentment62%22%1%8%7%
Average Racial Resentment30%51%4%9%6%
High Racial Resentment15%70%2%8%5%
  • Among individuals with low levels of racial resentment, a majority (62%) planned to vote for Kamala Harris, while a smaller portion (22%) supported Donald Trump. Conversely, individuals with high levels of racial resentment were more likely to support Donald Trump, with 70% in this category planning to vote for him, compared to only 15% for Harris.
  • For respondents who indicated they would vote for another candidate, were undecided, or did not plan to vote, there was a more balanced distribution across levels of racial resentment, with no particular level overwhelmingly dominant.  

VOTE CHOICE BY INTERNALIZED SEXISM AND RACIAL RESENTMENT

  • Moderate white women who are low in both internalized sexism and racial resentment are significantly more likely to report voting for Kamala Harris (89%) compared to Donald Trump (11%). 
  • Moderate white women who are high in both internalized sexism and racial resentment are significantly more likely to say they planned to vote for Donald Trump (88%) over Harris (12%).

KEY OPINION QUESTION #2
If Kamala Harris were to become the president of the United States, which of the following are you most concerned about? 

  • Not concerned
  • She is unqualified
  • She is untrustworthy
  • Concerned about something else
  • She was only chosen based on her gender
  • She was only chosen based on her race
  • She is aggressive

Moderate white women (n= 600)

Not concerned31%
She is unqualified28%
She is untrustworthy17%
Concerned about something else13%
She was only chosen based on her gender7%
She was only chosen based on her race3%
She is aggressive2%

TOPLINE TAKEAWAY

  • While “not concerned” was the most frequent response among moderate white women (31%), a significant portion also viewed her as “unqualified” (28%) or “untrustworthy” (17%).

CONCERNS ABOUT HARRIS BY VOTE CHOICE

Moderate white women (n= 600)

Kamala HarrisDonald Trump
Not concerned68%5%
She is unqualified5%46%
She is untrustworthy3%29%
Concerned about something else17%7%
She was only chosen based on her gender3%8%
She was only chosen based on her race2%4%
She is aggressive2%2%

TOPLINE TAKEAWAY

  • Respondents who said they’d vote for Harris overwhelmingly indicated they are “not concerned” (68%), while those who planned to vote for Trump expressed significantly more concerns about Harris being “unqualified” (46%) or “untrustworthy” (29%).

CONCERNS ABOUT HARRIS BY LEVEL OF INTERNALIZED SEXISM

Low Internalized SexismAverage Internalized SexismHigh Internalized Sexism
Not concerned54%31%13%
She is unqualified14%27%42%
She is untrustworthy9%17%23%
Concerned about something else18%15%4%
She was only chosen based on her gender2%6%12%
She was only chosen based on her race2%2%3%
She is aggressive1%2%3%

CONCERNS ABOUT HARRIS BY LEVEL OF RACIAL RESENTMENT

Low Racial ResentmentAverage Racial ResentmentHigh Racial Resentment
Not concerned49%29%14%
She is unqualified16%28%41%
She is untrustworthy15%18%17%
Concerned about something else14%14%10%
She was only chosen based on her gender3%7%11%
She was only chosen based on her race2%2%5%
She is aggressive2%2%1%

KEY OPINION QUESTION #3
Moderate white women were asked to select either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to determine who better embodies the traits listed below. 

If you had to say, who do you think is more…?

Stable
Qualified
Cares about people like me
Likable
Strong leader
Intelligent
Honest
Competent
Compassionate
Better communicator
Charismatic
Authentic
Uninformed
Reckless
Opportunistic
Insincere
Ineffective
Hypocritical
Divisive
Dishonest
Corrupt
Arrogant

Moderate white women (n= 1,200)

Kamala HarrisDonald Trump
Stable57%43%
Qualified40%60%
Cares about people like me50%50%
Likable57%43%
Strong leader35%65%
Intelligent45%55%
Honest53%47%
Competent46%54%
Compassionate64%36%
Better communicator52%48%
Charismatic44%56%
Authentic46%54%
Uninformed58%42%
Reckless37%63%
Opportunistic41%59%
Insincere48%52%
Ineffective60%40%
Hypocritical45%55%
Divisive39%61%
Dishonest46%54%
Corrupt42%58%
Arrogant22%78%

TOPLINE TAKEAWAYS

  • Moderate white women reported viewing Harris as more compassionate (64% vs. 36%), likable (57% vs. 43%), and stable (57% vs. 43%).
  • Conversely, they saw Trump as a strong leader (65% vs. 35%), qualified (60% vs. 40%), and charismatic (56% vs. 44%).
  • For negative traits, Trump is more frequently associated with being arrogant (78% vs. 22%), reckless (63% vs. 37%), and divisive (61% vs. 39%), reflecting concerns about his temperament and behavior. 
  • Harris was seen as uninformed (58% vs. 42%) and ineffective (60% vs. 40%).

KEY OPINION QUESTION #4
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following, [Kamala Harris / Donald Trump / Barack Obama / George W. Bush] is… 

Charismatic
Competent
Honorable
Intelligent
Leader
Passionate
Patriotic
Presidential
Respectful
Good speaker
Stands up for ordinary people
Strong

Moderate white women (n= 600)
Answers are ranked in order of how frequently they were selected.

Kamala HarrisDonald TrumpBarack ObamaGeorge W. Bush
Intelligent
Passionate
Respectful
Good speaker
Stands up for ordinary people
Strong
Patriotic
Leader
Passionate
Intelligent
Good speaker
Intelligent
Charismatic
Presidential
Competent
Patriotic
Respectful
Presidential
Leader
Honorable

Appendix

INTERNALIZED SEXISM BY AGE

Column graph showing internalized sexism by age group. For all age groups, most women have an "average" level. Results vary between groups, with younger women having more internalized sexism.

RACIAL RESENTMENT BY AGE

Column graph showing racial resentment by age group. Most women in each age group have "average" levels, and younger women have significantly lower levels of racial resentment.

RACIAL RESENTMENT & INTERNALIZED SEXISM BY EDUCATION LEVEL

Racial Resentment by Education LevelInternalized Sexism by Education Level
Two graphs showing that women with a bachelor's degree or higher have less internalized sexism and less racial resentment compared to women without a degree.

VOTE CHOICE BY EDUCATION LEVEL

Vote choice by education level chart showing that women without a bachelor's degree were more likely to vote for Trump in 2024, while women with a degree were a 50/50 split between Trump and Harris.

RACIAL RESENTMENT & INTERNALIZED SEXISM

Chart showing that racial resentment and sexism are correlated, but not not a perfect 1:1 correlation. As racial resentment increases, so does sexism to some degree.
  • There is a moderate positive correlation (R = 0.52; see blue regression line) between racial resentment and internalized sexism.

COMBINED RACIAL RESENTMENT & INTERNALIZED SEXISM SCORE BY VOTE CHOICE

A combined chart showing that women with more racial resentment and/or more sexism were more likely to vote for Donald Trump in 2024.

PREDICTIVE BINOMIAL MODEL: PROBABILITY OF VOTING FOR HARRIS BY INTERNALIZED SEXISM (IS) * RACIAL RESENTMENT (RR)

A chart showing that as internalized sexism increases, likelihood of voting for Harris decreases.
  • As internalized sexism increases, the probability of voting for Kamala Harris decreases, particularly among those with higher levels of racial resentment. 
  • Individuals with low racial resentment are more likely to vote for Harris, even as internalized sexism increases, while those with high racial resentment have the lowest probability of supporting her. 

PREDICTIVE BINOMIAL MODEL: PROBABILITY OF VOTING FOR HARRIS BY RACIAL RESENTMENT (RR) * INTERNALIZED SEXISM (IS)

A chart showing that as racial resentment increases, likelihood of voting for Harris decreases.
  • As racial resentment increases, the probability of voting for Kamala Harris decreases, with a stronger effect for those with higher levels of internalized sexism.
  • Individuals with low internalized sexism are more likely to support Harris across levels of racial resentment, while those with high internalized sexism have the lowest probability of voting for her, particularly at higher levels of racial resentment. 

METHODOLOGY

  • Audience: Ideologically Moderate US White Women
  • Sample size: 1,200
  • Dates in field: Monday, October 28, 2024 to Monday, November 4, 2024
Galvanize Action
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.